{
  "id": 1659760,
  "name": "MEADS v. N.C. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Meads v. N.C. Dept. of Agriculture",
  "decision_date": "1998-07-08",
  "docket_number": "No. 139A98",
  "first_page": "499",
  "last_page": "499",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "348 N.C. 499"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "128 N.C.App. 750",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 44,
    "char_count": 308,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.717,
    "sha256": "02f531878d8150e3b379d63b6f805e1f34b134cfe023f059f6c8acf7bb33fd05",
    "simhash": "1:cdae24fbbdf1b242",
    "word_count": 53
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:11:06.764212+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MEADS v. N.C. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by petitioner (Meads) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals allowed 8 July 1998.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MEADS v. N.C. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE\nNo. 139A98\nCase below: 128 N.C.App. 750"
  },
  "file_name": "0499-02",
  "first_page_order": 547,
  "last_page_order": 547
}