{
  "id": 1659902,
  "name": "BROMHAL v. STOTT",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bromhal v. Stott",
  "decision_date": "1998-07-29",
  "docket_number": "No. 213P98",
  "first_page": "692",
  "last_page": "692",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "348 N.C. 692"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "129 N.C.App. 426",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 32,
    "char_count": 263,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.775,
    "sha256": "28326810257868b08645d1a77393e766f32ef283775c0796796b1eaf8c075c6c",
    "simhash": "1:29b6157bdee0f86b",
    "word_count": 40
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:11:06.764212+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "BROMHAL v. STOTT"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Notice of appeal by defendant pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed 29 July 1998. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 29 July 1998.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "BROMHAL v. STOTT\nNo. 213P98\nCase below: 129 N.C.App. 426"
  },
  "file_name": "0692-02",
  "first_page_order": 740,
  "last_page_order": 740
}