{
  "id": 571678,
  "name": "CAUDILL v. DELLINGER",
  "name_abbreviation": "Caudill v. Dellinger",
  "decision_date": "1998",
  "docket_number": "No. 270A98",
  "first_page": "353",
  "last_page": "353",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "349 N.C. 353"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "129 N.C.App. 649",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11652142
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/129/0649-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 44,
    "char_count": 384,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.749,
    "sha256": "1f707f907d6a799f02e483eb6cbb8c02ed38d04c943c317759be6ca6a6f5d3ba",
    "simhash": "1:adfe34e3f9e3a846",
    "word_count": 63
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:15:14.712587+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CAUDILL v. DELLINGER"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 November 1998. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rules 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals allowed 5 November 1998.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CAUDILL v. DELLINGER\nNo. 270A98\nCase below: 129 N.C.App. 649"
  },
  "file_name": "0353-03",
  "first_page_order": 391,
  "last_page_order": 391
}