{
  "id": 571506,
  "name": "HEARNE v. SHERMAN",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hearne v. Sherman",
  "decision_date": "1998",
  "docket_number": "No. 309A98",
  "first_page": "358",
  "last_page": "358",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "349 N.C. 358"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "130 N.C.App. 340",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 52,
    "char_count": 388,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.757,
    "sha256": "34d04970aaed26ddf14cefd8c2f60fe4500d2a8ddac10a57758cd544da7a3573",
    "simhash": "1:ccab24fadb92f016",
    "word_count": 65
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:15:14.712587+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "HEARNE v. SHERMAN"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by respondent (Sherman et al) to dismiss appeal allowed 3 December 1998. Petition by petitioner for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 3 December 1998. Justice Wynn recused.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "HEARNE v. SHERMAN\nNo. 309A98\nCase below: 130 N.C.App. 340"
  },
  "file_name": "0358-01",
  "first_page_order": 396,
  "last_page_order": 396
}