{
  "id": 571577,
  "name": "ORTIZ v. CASE FARMS OF N.C.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ortiz v. Case Farms",
  "decision_date": "1998",
  "docket_number": "No. 456PA98",
  "first_page": "361",
  "last_page": "361",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "349 N.C. 361"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "130 N.C.App. 759",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 300,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.766,
    "sha256": "ea659993d4b01de180267620c54ddee3a0c86a72785168f9cff3728940d38d00",
    "simhash": "1:7c88947043b7ff63",
    "word_count": 49
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:15:14.712587+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ORTIZ v. CASE FARMS OF N.C."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 3 December 1998. Petition by defendants for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals dismissed 3 December 1998.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ORTIZ v. CASE FARMS OF N.C.\nNo. 456PA98\nCase below: 130 N.C.App. 759"
  },
  "file_name": "0361-04",
  "first_page_order": 399,
  "last_page_order": 399
}