{
  "id": 132320,
  "name": "SHANNON CAUDILL v. JAMES L. DELLINGER, C. RICKY BOWMAN, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Judicial District 17-B, and THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Caudill v. Dellinger",
  "decision_date": "1999-03-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 270A98",
  "first_page": "89",
  "last_page": "89",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "350 N.C. 89"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "501 S.E.2d 99",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1998,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "129 N.C. App. 649",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11652142
      ],
      "year": 1998,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/129/0649-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1156,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.749,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.0201659334197063e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5450290731235682
    },
    "sha256": "cf15e9f5de8418778b2811eee7c409d652ee117a44e43ed34bc129d153499190",
    "simhash": "1:2024573a3683211c",
    "word_count": 179
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:46:00.917666+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "SHANNON CAUDILL v. JAMES L. DELLINGER, C. RICKY BOWMAN, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Judicial District 17-B, and THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nOn defendant Dellinger\u2019s appeal, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the majority opinion by Judge Horton. Defendant\u2019s petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.\nAFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Elliot, Pishko, Gelbin & Morgan, PA., by David C. Pishko, for plaintiff-appellee.",
      "White & Crumpler, by H.W. Zimmerman, Jr., and Dudley A. Witt, for defendant-appellant Dellinger."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "SHANNON CAUDILL v. JAMES L. DELLINGER, C. RICKY BOWMAN, in his official capacity as District Attorney of Judicial District 17-B, and THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS\nNo. 270A98\n(Filed 4 March 1999)\nAppeal by defendant James L. Dellinger pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 129 N.C. App. 649, 501 S.E.2d 99 (1998), reversing and remanding a judgment entered by Cornelius, J., on 3 June 1997 in Superior Court, Surry County. On 5 November 1998 this Court allowed defendant Dellinger\u2019s petition for discretionary review as to additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 February 1999.\nElliot, Pishko, Gelbin & Morgan, PA., by David C. Pishko, for plaintiff-appellee.\nWhite & Crumpler, by H.W. Zimmerman, Jr., and Dudley A. Witt, for defendant-appellant Dellinger."
  },
  "file_name": "0089-01",
  "first_page_order": 141,
  "last_page_order": 141
}