{
  "id": 131938,
  "name": "STATE v. CINTRON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Cintron",
  "decision_date": "1999-07-22",
  "docket_number": "No. 190A99",
  "first_page": "839",
  "last_page": "839",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "350 N.C. 839"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "132 N.C.App. 605",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11239473
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/132/0605-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 42,
    "char_count": 281,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.716,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.004582120424781522
    },
    "sha256": "234c491ba577c9a78a0a90ed817df796a7d16698b9021711259185ac5ba7b80b",
    "simhash": "1:ebcea6ebf9c5e062",
    "word_count": 49
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:46:00.917666+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. CINTRON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 22 July 1999.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. CINTRON\nNo. 190A99\nCase below: 132 N.C.App. 605"
  },
  "file_name": "0839-01",
  "first_page_order": 891,
  "last_page_order": 891
}