{
  "id": 132153,
  "name": "STATE v. GARNER",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Garner",
  "decision_date": "1999-08-19",
  "docket_number": "No. 259P99",
  "first_page": "841",
  "last_page": "841",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "350 N.C. 841"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "133 N.C.App. 191",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 270,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.779,
    "sha256": "fbde3a3a01ca5a5e1bf9f41c489db0975cd63f56db199ea193fcbee953466a32",
    "simhash": "1:8fbf0023dfa6c83f",
    "word_count": 42
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:46:00.917666+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. GARNER"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 19 August 1999. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 19 August 1999.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. GARNER\nNo. 259P99\nCase below: 133 N.C.App. 191"
  },
  "file_name": "0841-02",
  "first_page_order": 893,
  "last_page_order": 893
}