{
  "id": 1155902,
  "name": "DELORES D. ROBINSON v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Robinson v. State, East Carolina University",
  "decision_date": "1999-10-08",
  "docket_number": "No. 203A99",
  "first_page": "38",
  "last_page": "39",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "351 N.C. 38"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "514 S.E.2d 301",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1999,
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 130,
    "char_count": 1591,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.758,
    "sha256": "1fbe493b2fa337c6496a027c939af3cb1ea9f048293a806d3aee45c9bafa4cf6",
    "simhash": "1:0c6a66aec6a122cc",
    "word_count": 255
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:38:07.529951+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "DELORES D. ROBINSON v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Eagles, C.J., the decision of the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the decision and order of the Industrial Commission, is reversed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Industrial Commission for entry of judgment in favor of defendant State of North Carolina, East Carolina University.\nREVERSED AND REMANDED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Gray, Newell & Johnson, L.L.P., by S. Camille Payton and Mark V.L. Gray, for plaintiff-appellee.",
      "Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Don Wright, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant-appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "DELORES D. ROBINSON v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY\nNo. 203A99\n(Filed 8 October 1999)\nState\u2014 tort claim \u2014 breach of duty and proximate cause\u2014 insufficient evidence\nA Court of Appeals decision affirming an order of the Industrial Commission awarding damages to plaintiff in a tort claim action for injuries received when a light fixture fell on her head in a building owned by defendant ECU is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals that plaintiff\u2019s evidence was insufficient to show that defendant\u2019s employee breached a duty to plaintiff or that any alleged breach of duty was the proximate cause of plaintiff\u2019s injury.\nAppeal by defendant pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 133 N.C. App.-, 514 S.E.2d 301 (1999), affirming a decision and order of the North Carolina Industrial Commission entered 10 March 1998. Heard in the Supreme Court 17 September 1999.\nGray, Newell & Johnson, L.L.P., by S. Camille Payton and Mark V.L. Gray, for plaintiff-appellee.\nMichael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Don Wright, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant-appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0038-01",
  "first_page_order": 88,
  "last_page_order": 89
}