{
  "id": 1155757,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CHARLES CARLO CINTRON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Cintron",
  "decision_date": "1999-10-08",
  "docket_number": "No. 190A99",
  "first_page": "39",
  "last_page": "39",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "351 N.C. 39"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "513 S.E.2d 794",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1999,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "132 N.C. App. 605",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11239473
      ],
      "year": 1999,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/132/0605-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 116,
    "char_count": 1349,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.709,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.1240649765327586e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3211557893915823
    },
    "sha256": "5ca1d4d5fe10c02879d07521fd8913facfc77f11095f22e36430eac9cc2c968e",
    "simhash": "1:af7f970366e3ec58",
    "word_count": 211
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:38:07.529951+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CHARLES CARLO CINTRON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Judge Lewis, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.\nREVERSED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Robert C. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.",
      "Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Appellate Defender, by Charlesena Elliott Walker, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendantappellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CHARLES CARLO CINTRON\nNo. 190A99\n(Filed 8 October 1999)\nHomicide\u2014 first-degree murder \u2014 second-degree instruction not required\nA Court of Appeals decision that the trial court erred in a first-degree murder prosecution by failing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of second-degree murder is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals that there was no evidence to support a finding by the jury that the murder was not premeditated and deliberate.\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 132 N.C. App. 605, 513 S.E.2d 794 (1999), holding that the trial court erred by not instructing on the lesser-included offense of second-degree murder, thus vacating the judgment entered 7 October 1997 by Martin (Jerry Cash), J., in Superior Court, Guilford County, and ordering a new trial. Heard in the Supreme Court 20 September 1999.\nMichael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Robert C. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.\nMalcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Appellate Defender, by Charlesena Elliott Walker, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendantappellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0039-01",
  "first_page_order": 89,
  "last_page_order": 89
}