{
  "id": 1155846,
  "name": "WILTON B. PARKER, SHIRLEY K. PARKER, RANDY PARKER, JANET T. PARKER, GARY PARKER, DIANE P. PARKER, KEITH PARKER, DARLENE W. PARKER, JAMES ALAN PARKER, ANN D. PARKER, KEITH SLOCUM, EUGENE BARBOUR, DIXIE BARBOUR, VERNON THOMPSON, PATRICIA THOMPSON, DELBERT ALLEN, JR., DEBORAH BLACKMON, BETTIE C. UPCHURCH, GLENN TWIGG, Administrator of the Estate of Pharo Twigg, DELLA T. TWIGG, THOMAS EARL TOOLE, MAYRLENE TOOLE, CHRISTINE P. THOMPSON, LAURCEY MASSENGILL, CHARLIE MATTHEWS and LORRAINE MATTHEWS v. W. TERRY BAREFOOT AND RITA J. BAREFOOT",
  "name_abbreviation": "Parker v. Barefoot",
  "decision_date": "1999-10-08",
  "docket_number": "No. 408A98",
  "first_page": "40",
  "last_page": "41",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "351 N.C. 40"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "502 S.E.2d 42",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1998,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "130 N.C. App. 18",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11464960
      ],
      "year": 1998,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/130/0018-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 184,
    "char_count": 2040,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.705,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.35021695942714e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5139338239410869
    },
    "sha256": "80bcb8f02b44b6a90198a00d52a797b4c39aa59f63613538a12f71fc218cb3b6",
    "simhash": "1:1b3f96082f17e10e",
    "word_count": 327
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:38:07.529951+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Justice Freeman did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "WILTON B. PARKER, SHIRLEY K. PARKER, RANDY PARKER, JANET T. PARKER, GARY PARKER, DIANE P. PARKER, KEITH PARKER, DARLENE W. PARKER, JAMES ALAN PARKER, ANN D. PARKER, KEITH SLOCUM, EUGENE BARBOUR, DIXIE BARBOUR, VERNON THOMPSON, PATRICIA THOMPSON, DELBERT ALLEN, JR., DEBORAH BLACKMON, BETTIE C. UPCHURCH, GLENN TWIGG, Administrator of the Estate of Pharo Twigg, DELLA T. TWIGG, THOMAS EARL TOOLE, MAYRLENE TOOLE, CHRISTINE P. THOMPSON, LAURCEY MASSENGILL, CHARLIE MATTHEWS and LORRAINE MATTHEWS v. W. TERRY BAREFOOT AND RITA J. BAREFOOT"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in the dissent of Judge John Martin in the Court of Appeals, the opinion of the Court of Appeals is reversed.\nREVERSED.\nJustice Freeman did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Morgan, Reeves & Gilchrist, by Robert B. Morgan and Mary Morgan Reeves, for plaintiff-appellees.",
      "Bode, Call & Stroupe, L.L.P., by John V. Hunter III and Diana E. Ricketts; and Narron, O\u2019Hale & Whittington, by John P. O\u2019Hale, for defendant-appellants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WILTON B. PARKER, SHIRLEY K. PARKER, RANDY PARKER, JANET T. PARKER, GARY PARKER, DIANE P. PARKER, KEITH PARKER, DARLENE W. PARKER, JAMES ALAN PARKER, ANN D. PARKER, KEITH SLOCUM, EUGENE BARBOUR, DIXIE BARBOUR, VERNON THOMPSON, PATRICIA THOMPSON, DELBERT ALLEN, JR., DEBORAH BLACKMON, BETTIE C. UPCHURCH, GLENN TWIGG, Administrator of the Estate of Pharo Twigg, DELLA T. TWIGG, THOMAS EARL TOOLE, MAYRLENE TOOLE, CHRISTINE P. THOMPSON, LAURCEY MASSENGILL, CHARLIE MATTHEWS and LORRAINE MATTHEWS v. W. TERRY BAREFOOT AND RITA J. BAREFOOT\nNo. 408A98\n(Filed 8 October 1999)\nNuisance\u2014 hog farm \u2014 state-of-the-art technology not defense \u2014 instruction not required\nA Court of Appeals decision is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals that the evidence in a nuisance action against the operators of an industrial hog farm did not require the trial court to give plaintiffs\u2019 requested instruction that the law does not recognize as a defense to a claim of nuisance that defendants used the best technical knowledge available at the time to avoid or alleviate the nuisance.\nJustice Freeman did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 130 N.C. App. 18, 502 S.E.2d 42 (1998), finding error in the instruction given to the jury by Manning, J., and subsequent judgment entered 24 September 1996 in Superior Court, Johnston County and ordering a new trial. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 April 1999.\nMorgan, Reeves & Gilchrist, by Robert B. Morgan and Mary Morgan Reeves, for plaintiff-appellees.\nBode, Call & Stroupe, L.L.P., by John V. Hunter III and Diana E. Ricketts; and Narron, O\u2019Hale & Whittington, by John P. O\u2019Hale, for defendant-appellants."
  },
  "file_name": "0040-01",
  "first_page_order": 90,
  "last_page_order": 91
}