{
  "id": 1155775,
  "name": "IN RE ESTATE OF HILL",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Estate of Hill",
  "decision_date": "1999-11-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 404P99",
  "first_page": "105",
  "last_page": "105",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "351 N.C. 105"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "134 N.C.App. 376",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 37,
    "char_count": 327,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.776,
    "sha256": "2af1addffc5ec9585fb4f925adb1ab3c8cd3aa0c13b2c5f1cdd3fa2a4b3d6b28",
    "simhash": "1:acbbb0435b40fce2",
    "word_count": 49
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:38:07.529951+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Justice Martin recused."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "IN RE ESTATE OF HILL"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Notice of appeal by petitioner (Thomas Hill) pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed 4 November 1999. Petition by petitioner (Thomas Hill) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 November 1999.\nJustice Martin recused.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN RE ESTATE OF HILL\nNo. 404P99\nCase below: 134 N.C.App. 376"
  },
  "file_name": "0105-02",
  "first_page_order": 155,
  "last_page_order": 155
}