{
  "id": 1155716,
  "name": "STATE v. SARTORI",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Sartori",
  "decision_date": "1999-12-02",
  "docket_number": "No. 356P99",
  "first_page": "190",
  "last_page": "190",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "351 N.C. 190"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "134 N.C.App. 188",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 37,
    "char_count": 296,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.798,
    "sha256": "a8eb6829567d3764195faf647ee43f696df4965f3dd1688bd9dce0795d42788b",
    "simhash": "1:8cb7a06388c0facb",
    "word_count": 47
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:38:07.529951+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. SARTORI"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant pro se for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 December 1999. Notice of appeal by defendant pro se pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 2 December 1999.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. SARTORI\nNo. 356P99\nCase below: 134 N.C.App. 188"
  },
  "file_name": "0190-03",
  "first_page_order": 240,
  "last_page_order": 240
}