{
  "id": 1155946,
  "name": "ARQUILLA v. CITY OF SALISBURY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Arquilla v. City of Salisbury",
  "decision_date": "2000-03-02",
  "docket_number": "No. 45P00",
  "first_page": "350",
  "last_page": "350",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "351 N.C. 350"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "136 N.C.App. 24",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11238247
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/136/0024-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 26,
    "char_count": 159,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.81,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.04248452322896045
    },
    "sha256": "aacb18db51b720e341a28c2cdd88ea5d706753f15b886136d630b6438fbe8137",
    "simhash": "1:0cec807c8a62d269",
    "word_count": 26
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:38:07.529951+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ARQUILLA v. CITY OF SALISBURY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 March 2000.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ARQUILLA v. CITY OF SALISBURY\nNo. 45P00\nCase below: 136 N.C.App. 24"
  },
  "file_name": "0350-03",
  "first_page_order": 400,
  "last_page_order": 400
}