{
  "id": 1155747,
  "name": "STATE v. BROOME",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Broome",
  "decision_date": "2000-03-02",
  "docket_number": "No. 23P00",
  "first_page": "362",
  "last_page": "362",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "351 N.C. 362"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "136 N.C.App. 82",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11238372
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/136/0082-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 261,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.784,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.042471008927547516
    },
    "sha256": "2eca0faf03ac4ed79ae51924df3ebf6ecf47d662c31b3271ddce2eb44c38bd1a",
    "simhash": "1:2efc847bde727821",
    "word_count": 42
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:38:07.529951+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. BROOME"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 2 March 2000. Petition by defendant for discretionary pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 March 2000.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. BROOME\nNo. 23P00\nCase below: 136 N.C.App. 82"
  },
  "file_name": "0362-02",
  "first_page_order": 412,
  "last_page_order": 412
}