{
  "id": 1155952,
  "name": "STATE v. HUNTER",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Hunter",
  "decision_date": "2000-02-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 590A99",
  "first_page": "364",
  "last_page": "364",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "351 N.C. 364"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "135 N.C.App. 633",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 40,
    "char_count": 332,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.762,
    "sha256": "1f66f03b2bf88e0e1be3f76ae7cc645c286fcc107c166fc9f689fda096355a31",
    "simhash": "1:249e097f5ba66c53",
    "word_count": 51
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:38:07.529951+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. HUNTER"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Notice of appeal by defendant pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed 3 February 2000 in that notice was not timely filed. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 February 2000.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. HUNTER\nNo. 590A99\nCase below: 135 N.C.App. 633"
  },
  "file_name": "0364-03",
  "first_page_order": 414,
  "last_page_order": 414
}