{
  "id": 1155626,
  "name": "IN RE SMITH",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Smith",
  "decision_date": "2000-05-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 102P00",
  "first_page": "641",
  "last_page": "641",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "351 N.C. 641"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "136 N.C.App. 442",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 24,
    "char_count": 142,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.787,
    "sha256": "6a6176a2f90b51df373e1c44a1d1dc1d7b5cb62f9e41f2db41cda127880848e3",
    "simhash": "1:0ddc14528a213262",
    "word_count": 24
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:38:07.529951+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN RE SMITH"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by respondent for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 May 2000.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN RE SMITH\nNo. 102P00\nCase below: 136 N.C.App. 442"
  },
  "file_name": "0641-04",
  "first_page_order": 691,
  "last_page_order": 691
}