{
  "id": 1155886,
  "name": "STATE v. FULMORE",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Fulmore",
  "decision_date": "2000-05-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 114P00",
  "first_page": "643",
  "last_page": "643",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "351 N.C. 643"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "136 N.C.App. 668",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 55,
    "char_count": 455,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.779,
    "sha256": "3080f3b61d6f4cd726d2a907891a57f133e80934e9bb6522fb73bfdd7aa337e4",
    "simhash": "1:89fea6e963d1a319",
    "word_count": 80
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:38:07.529951+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. FULMORE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Defendant\u2019s notice of appeal based upon a dissent treated as a petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 May 2000. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 4 May 2000.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. FULMORE\nNo. 114P00\nCase below: 136 N.C.App. 668"
  },
  "file_name": "0643-05",
  "first_page_order": 693,
  "last_page_order": 693
}