{
  "id": 685107,
  "name": "WINSTON-SALEM WRECKER ASS'N v. BARKER",
  "name_abbreviation": "Winston-Salem Wrecker Ass'n v. Barker",
  "decision_date": "2000-08-24",
  "docket_number": "No. 185P00",
  "first_page": "599",
  "last_page": "599",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "352 N.C. 599"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "137 N.C.App. 178",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 37,
    "char_count": 303,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.745,
    "sha256": "758096cd22f154322a0a5835acf22c2ec3bc956db7ed0b9f222754891af64383",
    "simhash": "1:cca234731a203c59",
    "word_count": 45
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:59:29.406982+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WINSTON-SALEM WRECKER ASS\u2019N v. BARKER"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Notice of appeal by plaintiffs pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 24 August 2000. Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 24 August 2000.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WINSTON-SALEM WRECKER ASS\u2019N v. BARKER\nNo. 185P00\nCase below: 137 N.C.App. 178"
  },
  "file_name": "0599-01",
  "first_page_order": 639,
  "last_page_order": 639
}