{
  "id": 684878,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MICHAEL ANTHONY ELLIOTT",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Elliott",
  "decision_date": "2000-10-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 179A00",
  "first_page": "663",
  "last_page": "664",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "352 N.C. 663"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "528 S.E.2d 32",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2000,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "137 N.C. App. 282",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11092991
      ],
      "year": 2000,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/137/0282-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 114,
    "char_count": 1203,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.734,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.296287805729208e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2708657917894055
    },
    "sha256": "25281ec7a73de115a0bd5bbff7a2e423fa17e3ccce46c5c0f80675b9bcc431ae",
    "simhash": "1:69ff5693a607c69f",
    "word_count": 197
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:59:29.406982+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MICHAEL ANTHONY ELLIOTT"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nFor the reasons stated in Judge Lewis\u2019s dissenting opinion, we reverse the opinion of the Court of Appeals.\nREVERSED.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Daniel P. O\u2019Brien, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.",
      "Kevin P. Bradley for defendant-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MICHAEL ANTHONY ELLIOTT\nNo. 179A00\n(Filed 6 October 2000)\nEvidence\u2014 general intent crimes \u2014 prior assault \u2014 admissibility to show intent\nThe decision of the Court of Appeals in this case is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals that evidence of a prior incident in which defendant hit the female victim\u2019s face was admissible in this prosecution for the general intent crimes of assault inflicting serious injury and assault on a female to show defendant\u2019s intent with respect to the present assault on the female victim.\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 137 N.C. App. 282, 528 S.E.2d 32 (2000), finding error in a judgment entered 22 October 1998 by Stephens (Donald W.), J., in Superior Court, Durham County, and ordering a new trial. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 September 2000.\nMichael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Daniel P. O\u2019Brien, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.\nKevin P. Bradley for defendant-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0663-01",
  "first_page_order": 703,
  "last_page_order": 704
}