{
  "id": 684892,
  "name": "D. MICHAEL HYDE, and wife, DINA M. HYDE v. CHESNEY GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hyde v. Chesney Glen Homeowners Ass'n",
  "decision_date": "2000-10-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 247A00",
  "first_page": "665",
  "last_page": "665",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "352 N.C. 665"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "529 S.E.2d 499",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 2000,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "137 N.C. App. 605",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11095199
      ],
      "year": 2000,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/137/0605-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 131,
    "char_count": 1345,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.738,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.024740438535219622
    },
    "sha256": "f6029ed1f15078833089158ab0e835eb9aca1e17fbaee8ddca2612d37f66758b",
    "simhash": "1:817a702ae7a5b27e",
    "word_count": 208
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:59:29.406982+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Justice Parker did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "D. MICHAEL HYDE, and wife, DINA M. HYDE v. CHESNEY GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM.\nThe decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in Judge Hunter\u2019s dissenting opinion.\nREVERSED.\nJustice Parker did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Levine & Stewart, by Michael D. Levine, for plaintiff-appellants.",
      "Jordan Price Wall Gray Jones & Carlton, PLLC, by Henry W. Jones, Jr., and Hope Derby Carmichael, for defendant-appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "D. MICHAEL HYDE, and wife, DINA M. HYDE v. CHESNEY GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.\nNo. 247A00\n(Filed 6 October 2000)\nDeeds\u2014 restrictive covenants \u2014 architectural review committee \u2014 above-ground pool \u2014 unreasonable denial\nThe decision of the Court of Appeals in this case is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals that a subdivision architectural review committee unreasonably withheld approval of plaintiffs\u2019 application for permission to construct an above-ground swimming pool where it failed to give plaintiffs notice of valid reasons why the application was denied.\nAppeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. \u00a7 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 137 N.C. App. 605, 529 S.E.2d 499 (2000), affirming a judgment entered 15 September 1998 and orders signed 15 January 1999 by Morgan (Michael R.), J., in District Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 September 2000.\nLevine & Stewart, by Michael D. Levine, for plaintiff-appellants.\nJordan Price Wall Gray Jones & Carlton, PLLC, by Henry W. Jones, Jr., and Hope Derby Carmichael, for defendant-appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0665-01",
  "first_page_order": 705,
  "last_page_order": 705
}