{
  "id": 685068,
  "name": "LANGDON v. N.C. DEP'T OF TRANSP.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Langdon v. N.C. Dep't of Transp.",
  "decision_date": "2000-10-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 338P00",
  "first_page": "675",
  "last_page": "675",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "352 N.C. 675"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "138 N.C.App. 553",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 42,
    "char_count": 320,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.699,
    "sha256": "c47695320910c59a3ef03cb465afad88e7c5e45604b0bf3b819e032a6f9fb51f",
    "simhash": "1:ff3e8ba9573f8718",
    "word_count": 53
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:59:29.406982+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "LANGDON v. N.C. DEP\u2019T OF TRANSP."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Eetition by plaintiff pro se for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 October 2000. Motion by defendant to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 October 2000.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "LANGDON v. N.C. DEP\u2019T OF TRANSP.\nNo. 338P00\nCase below: 138 N.C.App. 553"
  },
  "file_name": "0675-01",
  "first_page_order": 715,
  "last_page_order": 715
}