{
  "id": 135755,
  "name": "PEACOCK v. SHINN",
  "name_abbreviation": "Peacock v. Shinn",
  "decision_date": "2000-12-20",
  "docket_number": "No. 442P00",
  "first_page": "267",
  "last_page": "267",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "353 N.C. 267"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "139 N.C. App. 487",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        9497081
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/139/0487-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 38,
    "char_count": 278,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.785,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.0047699692144213815
    },
    "sha256": "24aa8821fa11c3ef19402c1bc63beabec6b594dcf5117901359ab72c47813dba",
    "simhash": "1:093e01f19e245447",
    "word_count": 44
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:31:00.841375+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "PEACOCK v. SHINN"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by respondents to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 20 December 2000. Petition by plaintiff pro se for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 20 December 2000.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "PEACOCK v. SHINN\nNo. 442P00\nCase below: 139 N.C. App. 487"
  },
  "file_name": "0267-04",
  "first_page_order": 315,
  "last_page_order": 315
}