{
  "id": 135633,
  "name": "JAMES v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.",
  "name_abbreviation": "James v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.",
  "decision_date": "2001-04-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 112A01",
  "first_page": "376",
  "last_page": "376",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "353 N.C. 376"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "142 N.C. App. 721",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 48,
    "char_count": 321,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.754,
    "sha256": "00a405badd6daaac978477c0d2711e7a7a0202ddd8edc190255c21695989b43d",
    "simhash": "1:cbfeb66afbf2f422",
    "word_count": 55
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:31:00.841375+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Justice Edmunds recused."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "JAMES v. WAL-MART STORES, INC."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 5 April 2001.\nJustice Edmunds recused.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JAMES v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.\nNo. 112A01\nCase below: 142 N.C. App. 721"
  },
  "file_name": "0376-01",
  "first_page_order": 424,
  "last_page_order": 424
}