{
  "id": 135848,
  "name": "SMITH v. BEAUFORT CTY. HOSP. ASS'N, INC.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Smith v. Beaufort Cty. Hosp. Ass'n",
  "decision_date": "2001-03-02",
  "docket_number": "No. 83A01",
  "first_page": "381",
  "last_page": "381",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "353 N.C. 381"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 49,
    "char_count": 321,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.776,
    "sha256": "4cc661ca171604aa87996237a871a2fadbab47e8c6b950ccf803c7e9514a0692",
    "simhash": "1:036e2669b1d5e446",
    "word_count": 56
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:31:00.841375+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "SMITH v. BEAUFORT CTY. HOSP. ASS\u2019N, INC."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 2 March 2001.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "SMITH v. BEAUFORT CTY. HOSP. ASS\u2019N, INC.\nNo. 83A01\nCase below: 141 N.C. App.-(29 December 2000)"
  },
  "file_name": "0381-03",
  "first_page_order": 429,
  "last_page_order": 429
}