{
  "id": 135753,
  "name": "STATE v. HOUGH",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Hough",
  "decision_date": "2001-03-01",
  "docket_number": "No. 24A01",
  "first_page": "389",
  "last_page": "389",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "353 N.C. 389"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "141 N.C. App. 351",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 32,
    "char_count": 203,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.788,
    "sha256": "e4c5ca6d386bdc8aff32d74b583bc866d6f9baf559ef7d54b7f213b4e902fb5c",
    "simhash": "1:7eb885237e207860",
    "word_count": 33
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:31:00.841375+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Justice Edmunds recused."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. HOUGH"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 1 March 2001.\nJustice Edmunds recused.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. HOUGH\nNo. 24A01\nCase below: 141 N.C. App. 351"
  },
  "file_name": "0389-05",
  "first_page_order": 437,
  "last_page_order": 437
}