{
  "id": 135775,
  "name": "STATE v. KELLY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Kelly",
  "decision_date": "2001-02-01",
  "docket_number": "No. 529P00",
  "first_page": "390",
  "last_page": "390",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "353 N.C. 390"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "140 N.C. App. 387",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 38,
    "char_count": 295,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.749,
    "sha256": "0162c83ecf847068ddd98923159ae3fa6071bf50182eeb3e3ae913ff205f36ea",
    "simhash": "1:8cf4e977cafbda4b",
    "word_count": 48
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:31:00.841375+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. KELLY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Notice of appeal by defendant pro se pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 1 February 2001. Petition by defendant pro se for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 February 2001.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. KELLY\nNo. 529P00\nCase below: 140 N.C. App. 387"
  },
  "file_name": "0390-04",
  "first_page_order": 438,
  "last_page_order": 438
}