{
  "id": 135727,
  "name": "STATE v. TUCKER",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Tucker",
  "decision_date": "2001-05-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 118P01-2",
  "first_page": "455",
  "last_page": "455",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "353 N.C. 455"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "140 N.C. App. 790",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 24,
    "char_count": 128,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.82,
    "sha256": "5c75ba07b016ea4f7ce7bdf80bc91389270c4e8f76cc07b50b9ede99be470187",
    "simhash": "1:5d664c64c139e558",
    "word_count": 24
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:31:00.841375+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. TUCKER"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant pro se for writ of mandamus denied 3 May 2001.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. TUCKER\nNo. 118P01-2\nCase below: 140 N.C. App. 790"
  },
  "file_name": "0455-04",
  "first_page_order": 503,
  "last_page_order": 503
}