{
  "id": 135686,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ISAAC JACKSON STROUD",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Stroud",
  "decision_date": "2001-06-07",
  "docket_number": "No. 165A95-3",
  "first_page": "524",
  "last_page": "524",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "353 N.C. 524"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 63,
    "char_count": 512,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.731,
    "sha256": "69134897a7dec89eb2fe58349f0f695ef0b49688642ab106b2bb5977da4df84c",
    "simhash": "1:9c63b0fe80d3132d",
    "word_count": 82
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:31:00.841375+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ISAAC JACKSON STROUD"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER\nAfter carefully considering defendant\u2019s pro se motion requesting that this Court void a previously filed petition for writ of certiorari, it appears to the Court that defendant is attempting to represent himself despite being currently represented by court-appointed counsel. Therefore, we dismiss the pro se filing.\nBy order of the Court in Conference, this 7th day of June, 2001.\ns/ G.K. Butterfield. Jr.. J.\nFor the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "s/ G.K. Butterfield. Jr.. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ISAAC JACKSON STROUD\nNo. 165A95-3\n(Filed 7 June 2001)"
  },
  "file_name": "0524-01",
  "first_page_order": 572,
  "last_page_order": 572
}