{
  "id": 135619,
  "name": "PETTY v. PETTY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Petty v. Petty",
  "decision_date": "2001-07-19",
  "docket_number": "No. 268P01",
  "first_page": "729",
  "last_page": "729",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "353 N.C. 729"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "143 N.C. App. 185",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 325,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.798,
    "sha256": "9a3eea14f0ae5d2e0b471a1b2cb184969403ac9eedb85c0fa8295cace50c253a",
    "simhash": "1:cdb170731a287879",
    "word_count": 48
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:31:00.841375+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "PETTY v. PETTY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Notice of appeal by defendant-intervenor (Steve Petty) pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 19 July 2001. Petition by defendant-intervenor (Steve Petty) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 19 July 2001.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "PETTY v. PETTY\nNo. 268P01\nCase below: 143 N.C. App. 185"
  },
  "file_name": "0729-01",
  "first_page_order": 777,
  "last_page_order": 777
}