{
  "id": 138328,
  "name": "IN RE HAYES",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Hayes",
  "decision_date": "2001-08-16",
  "docket_number": "No. 348P01",
  "first_page": "69",
  "last_page": "69",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "354 N.C. 69"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "143 N.C. App. 715",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 294,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.802,
    "sha256": "beedfac276e21970e32919e4ec8b033822738f3940996301658c7e9c563b09f5",
    "simhash": "1:c495b073daac5473",
    "word_count": 46
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:55:42.215284+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN RE HAYES"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Notice of appeal by respondent (Hayes) pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 16 August 2001. Petition by respondent (Hayes) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 August 2001.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN RE HAYES\nNo. 348P01\nCase below: 143 N.C. App. 715"
  },
  "file_name": "0069-05",
  "first_page_order": 103,
  "last_page_order": 103
}