{
  "id": 138411,
  "name": "STATE v. CONRAD",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Conrad",
  "decision_date": "2001-08-16",
  "docket_number": "No. 315P01",
  "first_page": "71",
  "last_page": "71",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "354 N.C. 71"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "137 N.C. App. 588",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 219,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.775,
    "sha256": "71adcaf587765db4f8c6731d4cea5bbc2116e44333923bb645966707d09b1519",
    "simhash": "1:2e3c904d0b4de5b9",
    "word_count": 38
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:55:42.215284+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. CONRAD"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant pro se for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 16 August 2001. Justice Edmunds recused.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. CONRAD\nNo. 315P01\nCase below: 137 N.C. App. 588"
  },
  "file_name": "0071-02",
  "first_page_order": 105,
  "last_page_order": 105
}