{
  "id": 138292,
  "name": "STATE v. BARKLEY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Barkley",
  "decision_date": "2001-10-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 437A01",
  "first_page": "221",
  "last_page": "221",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "354 N.C. 221"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "144 N.C. App. 514",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11435462
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/144/0514-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 29,
    "char_count": 183,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.8,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.004941986965263226
    },
    "sha256": "afc695a90d5a7957cff076a8ec6a3d97a25558273d789e2fe574ab2bed96d694",
    "simhash": "1:0bbc013156ae6811",
    "word_count": 30
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:55:42.215284+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. BARKLEY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 October 2001.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. BARKLEY\nNo. 437A01\nCase below: 144 N.C. App. 514"
  },
  "file_name": "0221-05",
  "first_page_order": 255,
  "last_page_order": 255
}