{
  "id": 138370,
  "name": "STATE v. PRATT",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Pratt",
  "decision_date": "2001-10-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 99P01",
  "first_page": "226",
  "last_page": "226",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "354 N.C. 226"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "141 N.C. App. 352",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 49,
    "char_count": 459,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.721,
    "sha256": "cfdbdee65d42921300b10344d07f797098177c0f0768a1783df7d7b6e7ececfc",
    "simhash": "1:0bb9ae3d12a4d61d",
    "word_count": 76
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:55:42.215284+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. PRATT"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by defendant to treat notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review as petition for writ of certiorari allowed 4 October 2001. Notice of appeal by defendant pursuant to G. S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 4 October 2001. Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 October 2001.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. PRATT\nNo. 99P01\nCase below: 141 N.C. App. 352"
  },
  "file_name": "0226-01",
  "first_page_order": 260,
  "last_page_order": 260
}