{
  "id": 138335,
  "name": "STATE v. PULLIAM",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Pulliam",
  "decision_date": "2001-10-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 468P01",
  "first_page": "226",
  "last_page": "226",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "354 N.C. 226"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "144 N.C. App. 205",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 44,
    "char_count": 406,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.726,
    "sha256": "10fce363b544ebc44d60f42d852b3328df3ce8bc376c523fd6113c54de412972",
    "simhash": "1:0f9d8a7f0ea0fe3d",
    "word_count": 66
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:55:42.215284+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. PULLIAM"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 October 2001. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 2001. Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 October 2001.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. PULLIAM\nNo. 468P01\nCase below: 144 N.C. App. 205"
  },
  "file_name": "0226-02",
  "first_page_order": 260,
  "last_page_order": 260
}