{
  "id": 138359,
  "name": "DURHAM VIDEO & NEWS, INC. v. DURHAM BD. OF ADJUST.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Durham Video & News, Inc. v. Durham Bd. of Adjust.",
  "decision_date": "2001-11-08",
  "docket_number": "No. 486P01",
  "first_page": "361",
  "last_page": "361",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "354 N.C. 361"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "144 N.C. App. 236",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11433691
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/144/0236-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 40,
    "char_count": 317,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.818,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.004947006562930889
    },
    "sha256": "d1331143b4740748a4f1837160a41e736a0da2cce0e7ba282956d0c1203726f6",
    "simhash": "1:e9b23b7342aae847",
    "word_count": 50
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:55:42.215284+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "DURHAM VIDEO & NEWS, INC. v. DURHAM BD. OF ADJUST."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Notice of appeal by plaintiff pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 8 November 2001. Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 November 2001.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "DURHAM VIDEO & NEWS, INC. v. DURHAM BD. OF ADJUST.\nNo. 486P01\nCase below: 144 N.C. App. 236"
  },
  "file_name": "0361-02",
  "first_page_order": 395,
  "last_page_order": 395
}