{
  "id": 138446,
  "name": "IN RE ECKARD",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Eckard",
  "decision_date": "2001-11-08",
  "docket_number": "No. 415P01",
  "first_page": "362",
  "last_page": "362",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "354 N.C. 362"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "144 N.C. App. 187",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11433499
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/144/0187-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "354 N.C. 359",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        138479
      ],
      "year": 2001,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/354/0359-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "354 N.C. 356",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        138345
      ],
      "year": 2001,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/354/0356-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 47,
    "char_count": 365,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.751,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.0049551151437786526
    },
    "sha256": "20815ba0914017b1344f6cf5bea4d96b4c7bc53b63f4d9269d02bd5f9519ac83",
    "simhash": "1:ff3d1c63ee2e4deb",
    "word_count": 66
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:55:42.215284+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN RE ECKARD"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by Guardian ad Litem for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 8 November 2001 for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the North Carolina Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of In re Dula, 354 N.C. 356,-S.E. 2d-(2001) and In re Pope, 354 N.C. 359, \u2014 S.E. 2d \u2014 (2001).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN RE ECKARD\nNo. 415P01\nCase below: 144 N.C. App. 187"
  },
  "file_name": "0362-01",
  "first_page_order": 396,
  "last_page_order": 396
}