{
  "id": 138291,
  "name": "STATE v. PEARSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Pearson",
  "decision_date": "2001-11-08",
  "docket_number": "No. 541A01",
  "first_page": "369",
  "last_page": "369",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "354 N.C. 369"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "145 N.C. App. 506",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11438843
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/145/0506-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 46,
    "char_count": 329,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.76,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.004941793903814469
    },
    "sha256": "7d19ef0e8c6f472c77bc92690a704a8cf18bf12791e7a079b5b16aff891ba34a",
    "simhash": "1:3db4a3f9366e0ca5",
    "word_count": 55
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:55:42.215284+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. PEARSON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 8 November 2001. Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. PEARSON\nNo. 541A01\nCase below: 145 N.C. App. 506"
  },
  "file_name": "0369-01",
  "first_page_order": 403,
  "last_page_order": 403
}