{
  "id": 220105,
  "name": "STATE v. DUCKER",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Ducker",
  "decision_date": "2002-01-31",
  "docket_number": "No. 377P01",
  "first_page": "218",
  "last_page": "218",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "355 N.C. 218"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "143 N.C. App. 716",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 37,
    "char_count": 273,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.72,
    "sha256": "008833eef992d7bf24ae34e3c2db8e21466254661678d09ab12da6724e82bddf",
    "simhash": "1:e9f4107b3e20dcbf",
    "word_count": 43
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:24:10.729326+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. DUCKER"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 31 January 2002. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 31 January 2002.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. DUCKER\nNo. 377P01\nCase below: 143 N.C. App. 716"
  },
  "file_name": "0218-01",
  "first_page_order": 266,
  "last_page_order": 266
}