{
  "id": 220004,
  "name": "CONWAY v. YEOMANS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Conway v. Yeomans",
  "decision_date": "2002-03-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 20P02",
  "first_page": "284",
  "last_page": "284",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "355 N.C. 284"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "148 N.C. App. 214",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 38,
    "char_count": 291,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.764,
    "sha256": "a2a1a946cb2b2bef9cc0e2206dd2bd4e8002b5a1787aa8b9b10410b9942b7de8",
    "simhash": "1:8ed7b57a8e28fa6a",
    "word_count": 48
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:24:10.729326+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CONWAY v. YEOMANS"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Notice of appeal by plaintiff pro se pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 6 March 2002. Petition by plaintiff pro se for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 March 2002.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CONWAY v. YEOMANS\nNo. 20P02\nCase below: 148 N.C. App. 214"
  },
  "file_name": "0284-02",
  "first_page_order": 332,
  "last_page_order": 332
}