{
  "id": 220001,
  "name": "STATE v. ISENBERG",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Isenberg",
  "decision_date": "2001-03-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 73P02",
  "first_page": "288",
  "last_page": "288",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "355 N.C. 288"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "148 N.C. App. 29",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        9363550
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/148/0029-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 38,
    "char_count": 271,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.79,
    "sha256": "7ecac44f84efe9ca024dc86be0919e60340ebce65c868038e21135839a381a20",
    "simhash": "1:cfed8178d6aaf83f",
    "word_count": 44
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:24:10.729326+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. ISENBERG"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 6 March 2002. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 March 2001.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. ISENBERG\nNo. 73P02\nCase below: 148 N.C. App. 29"
  },
  "file_name": "0288-04",
  "first_page_order": 336,
  "last_page_order": 336
}