{
  "id": 220123,
  "name": "STATE v. PUGH",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Pugh",
  "decision_date": "2002-03-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 13P02",
  "first_page": "290",
  "last_page": "290",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "355 N.C. 290"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "147 N.C. App. 789",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 36,
    "char_count": 275,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.764,
    "sha256": "ec41fd77eb4b0a3a2577a5e41c71ef7a90414b798aa859fbb8a3e2aaedbaa5d9",
    "simhash": "1:cfa5357bd2a2784e",
    "word_count": 44
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:24:10.729326+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. PUGH"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Notice of appeal by respondent pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 6 March 2002. Petition by respondent for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 March 2002.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. PUGH\nNo. 13P02\nCase below: 147 N.C. App. 789"
  },
  "file_name": "0290-04",
  "first_page_order": 338,
  "last_page_order": 338
}