{
  "id": 220003,
  "name": "HARRELL v. HAWLEY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Harrell v. Hawley",
  "decision_date": "2002-04-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 104PA02",
  "first_page": "349",
  "last_page": "349",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "355 N.C. 349"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "148 N.C. App. 214",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 51,
    "char_count": 460,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.776,
    "sha256": "f44d7b90ad3262dfa3b94324b630e27d81e0fcd7e8048ffa4463fe39d2cd1c8e",
    "simhash": "1:69faae6ddfe05e69",
    "word_count": 74
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:24:10.729326+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "HARRELL v. HAWLEY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant/third party plaintiff (Ayers) for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 4 April 2002. Notice of appeal by defendant/third party plaintiff (Ayers) pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (based upon a dissent) dismissed ex mero motu 4 April 2002. Motion by defendant/third party plaintiff (Ayers) for relief under Rule 2 dismissed 4 April 2002.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "HARRELL v. HAWLEY\nNo. 104PA02\nCase below: 148 N.C. App. 214"
  },
  "file_name": "0349-01",
  "first_page_order": 397,
  "last_page_order": 397
}