{
  "id": 219947,
  "name": "STATE v. McNEILL",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. McNeill",
  "decision_date": "2002-04-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 105A02",
  "first_page": "352",
  "last_page": "352",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "355 N.C. 352"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "148 N.C. App. 407",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 32,
    "char_count": 193,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.765,
    "sha256": "ef99ff5c9471f7d5bc2a9832176d47ac589eaf4cbd9c4dc4590acebfc8cb01a1",
    "simhash": "1:cab7b0767e99f84b",
    "word_count": 32
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:24:10.729326+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. McNEILL"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Notice of appeal by defendant pro se pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 4 April 2002.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. McNEILL\nNo. 105A02\nCase below: 148 N.C. App. 407"
  },
  "file_name": "0352-01",
  "first_page_order": 400,
  "last_page_order": 400
}