{
  "id": 220166,
  "name": "STATE v. ARRINGTON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Arrington",
  "decision_date": "2002-05-09",
  "docket_number": "No. 489P01",
  "first_page": "494",
  "last_page": "494",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "355 N.C. 494"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "135 N.C. App. 232",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 42,
    "char_count": 312,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.775,
    "sha256": "bfd7551bad90ac85176528015425b55ae8d5b179c6fdf27bbfe65f9e5f55fdb0",
    "simhash": "1:cfbf356b1bb9be31",
    "word_count": 52
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:24:10.729326+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. ARRINGTON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 9 May 2002. Notice of appeal by plaintiff pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 9 May 2002.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. ARRINGTON\nNo. 489P01\nCase below: 135 N.C. App. 232"
  },
  "file_name": "0494-02",
  "first_page_order": 542,
  "last_page_order": 542
}