{
  "id": 219923,
  "name": "STATE v. NANCE",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Nance",
  "decision_date": "2002-05-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 226P02",
  "first_page": "498",
  "last_page": "498",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "355 N.C. 498"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "149 N.C. App. 734",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        9131583
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/149/0734-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 42,
    "char_count": 422,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.773,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.008726763606681317
    },
    "sha256": "afb94cfab6360597cb787a6169717ae70e667324ecc118232003dac6b5218cd5",
    "simhash": "1:d1bbb132018cd45d",
    "word_count": 69
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:24:10.729326+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. NANCE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by Attorney General for temporary stay denied 3 May 2002. Petition by Attorney General for writ of supersedeas denied 3 May 2002. Notice of appeal by Attorney General pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 3 May 2002. Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 May 2002.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. NANCE\nNo. 226P02\nCase below: 149 N.C. App. 734"
  },
  "file_name": "0498-05",
  "first_page_order": 546,
  "last_page_order": 546
}