{
  "id": 219979,
  "name": "STATE v. HAMILTON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Hamilton",
  "decision_date": "2002-06-27",
  "docket_number": "No. 269P02",
  "first_page": "753",
  "last_page": "753",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "355 N.C. 753"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "148 N.C. App. 216",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 32,
    "char_count": 194,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.813,
    "sha256": "47335150eb1b6613d48d089a5a5485247e2a9c7f4818e45d91a8a975094a5627",
    "simhash": "1:752fd66e076de699",
    "word_count": 35
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:24:10.729326+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. HAMILTON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant pro se for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 27 June 2002.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. HAMILTON\nNo. 269P02\nCase below: 148 N.C. App. 216"
  },
  "file_name": "0753-05",
  "first_page_order": 801,
  "last_page_order": 801
}