{
  "id": 220077,
  "name": "TUCKER v. MECKLENBURG CTY. ZONING BD. OF ADJUST.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Tucker v. Mecklenburg Cty. Zoning Bd. of Adjust.",
  "decision_date": "2002-06-27",
  "docket_number": "No. 68A02",
  "first_page": "758",
  "last_page": "758",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "355 N.C. 758"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "148 N.C. App. 52",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        9363630
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/148/0052-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 47,
    "char_count": 315,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.691,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.008739505662299231
    },
    "sha256": "9b9d61f98ae5054a4cf590e91717979dd0336ea7fc7d9b95b30b2e1914e9c93b",
    "simhash": "1:5dfe27e8af836006",
    "word_count": 55
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:24:10.729326+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "TUCKER v. MECKLENBURG CTY. ZONING BD. OF ADJUST."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rul\u00e9 16 (b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals allowed 27 June 2002.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "TUCKER v. MECKLENBURG CTY. ZONING BD. OF ADJUST.\nNo. 68A02\nCase below: 148 N.C. App. 52"
  },
  "file_name": "0758-02",
  "first_page_order": 806,
  "last_page_order": 806
}