{
  "id": 1511636,
  "name": "IN RE PITTMAN",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Pittman",
  "decision_date": "2002-04-15",
  "docket_number": "No. 229P02",
  "first_page": "163",
  "last_page": "163",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "356 N.C. 163"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "149 N.C. App. 756",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        9131717
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/149/0756-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 40,
    "char_count": 313,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.728,
    "sha256": "a2f54316192dfef18ba40f2a2c1c1ccfc98d8b996a0309ebd36d27f55da48084",
    "simhash": "1:88aa1d538a80bc68",
    "word_count": 48
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:17:54.672071+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN RE PITTMAN"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Notice of appeal by respondent (Lekeshia Harris) pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 15 August 2002. Petition by respondent (James Pittman) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 15 April 2002.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN RE PITTMAN\nNo. 229P02\nCase below: 149 N.C. App. 756"
  },
  "file_name": "0163-03",
  "first_page_order": 213,
  "last_page_order": 213
}