{
  "id": 1511125,
  "name": "HILL v. HILL",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hill v. Hill",
  "decision_date": "2002-10-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 688P01",
  "first_page": "301",
  "last_page": "301",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "356 N.C. 301"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "147 N.C. App. 313",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 48,
    "char_count": 464,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.753,
    "sha256": "fb3f37390dc7af5513502573138bf4c92a02f10b8682b78ee14e18e96300b82d",
    "simhash": "1:e72e14fabe352c46",
    "word_count": 74
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:17:54.672071+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "HILL v. HILL"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion by defendants (Garford Hill, Jewell Hill, Barbara Garrison and William Garrison) to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 October 2002. Eetition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 October 2002. Motion by plaintiff for summary remand denied 3 October 2002. Motion by plaintiff not to remove Hon. Mark D. Martin denied 3 October 2002.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "HILL v. HILL\nNo. 688P01\nCase below: 147 N.C. App. 313"
  },
  "file_name": "0301-04",
  "first_page_order": 351,
  "last_page_order": 351
}